Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ben Mizen's avatar

I really liked the way you set out the five volunteer types. It reminded me that teams in youth ministry only work when we stop thinking of people as generic helpers and start valuing the particular things they bring. Reading it also made me think about how leadership actually moves within a team. At some points it will be the visionary who carries everyone forward, at others the manager who makes sure things get done, and at others the natural who young people instinctively trust. Shared leadership (Pearce and Conger) captures this well, showing how leadership shifts between people depending on the situation, while situational leadership (Hersey and Blanchard) argues that no one style is right all the time. This becomes especially important because many youth workers find themselves surrounded by volunteers with more life experience or practical leadership than they have themselves. The question is not whether the worker leads, but how. Leadership that releases and recognises others builds strength in the body, but leadership that clings to control can damage it. Too often insecurity or ego turns the worker into a bottleneck, or worse, into the kind of despot who stifles others rather than serving them.

Difference, of course, brings tension. A visionary and a manager can easily wind each other up, and a resourcer can flood the group with too many ideas. Belbin’s team roles explain why this happens, since some roles are naturally at odds, while Tuckman’s stages of group development suggest that clashes are part of the process by which a team matures. That fits with scripture’s reminder that God uses difference, and even friction, to grow patience and build maturity. Yet whether these tensions become fruitful or destructive often depends on the culture set by the worker. A leader who is secure can hold difference well and allow others to flourish. A leader who fears losing control can close down disagreement, suppress the visionary, or sideline the natural that young people trust. Young people themselves will read the team in their own way, often gravitating towards the natural or the visionary even if someone else carries the formal responsibility. Symbolic interactionism (Blumer) helps explain this because it shows how people assign meaning through relationships. It also highlights why an egotistical worker who insists on being the centre can miss the reality that influence and trust are often located elsewhere.

I was also struck by the role of the quieter contributions. The five types you describe are all visible in the programme, but most teams also rely on those who keep safeguarding strong, manage the background systems, or offer pastoral care in less public ways. Distributed cognition (Hutchins) shows why this is important, since it argues that the effectiveness of a team comes not only from visible actions but also from the background routines that support them. Paul had already made the point when he wrote that the parts of the body that seem weaker are indispensable, and that helps me see hidden work as service honoured by God even if it is unnoticed by others. Yet again, it is often the posture of the worker that determines whether these roles are valued or treated as expendable. A youth worker who sees themselves as the hub may reduce these contributions to background labour. A youth worker who leads with humility will recognise them as essential gifts placed in the body by God.

When you add adaptive leadership (Heifetz), which stresses that teams need to shift and grow over time as people develop new strengths, the picture becomes not only flexible and sustainable but also faithful. It reflects the way God continually builds the church through many different people. Your five types give a language for noticing difference, and these perspectives help explain why those differences matter, but the real depth is in knowing that God has placed these gifts in people for the sake of the community. The youth worker’s role, at its best, is to create the space where those gifts are released. At its worst, it is to hoard authority and turn a body into a hierarchy.

Expand full comment

No posts